by Victoria Nahum, co-founder of safecarecampaign.org
This morning I woke up slowly and not without some anxiety amidst many deep thoughts having to do with my family. I wondered which memories my husband, Armando would concentrate on today, Father’s Day 2008 - the warm, happy ones associated with his own father and our children - or the sad ones of loss and loneliness and how he sorely missed our son Josh a year and a half after he’d died from a health care acquired infection. This day would be even more difficult since we just found out 3 days ago that his own father has been diagnosed with chronic leukemia.
I laid there thinking about all the issues surrounding infection prevention like compulsive hand hygiene and the 2 very different camps regarding the “zero infection rate” controversy. I considered issues like the additional costs associated with prevention and hospital budgets and what the providers will pay for and blah, blah, blah. Suddenly, I knew the answer we were looking for all along. Surprisingly, the answer itself came from another question.
It asks -
What if it is YOUR (fill in the blank: young son, beautiful daughter, loving mother, terrific father, dear sister, favorite brother, best friend, etc.) who is or might become sick or infected or die from a health care acquired infection? Would YOU INSIST on:
the hand hygiene,
the ointment …
no matter WHAT the price or inconvenience to make sure your loved one would be well and would not die?”
In a moment - all of the unnecessary discord and clamor associated with infection prevention: the inconvenience of compulsive hand hygiene, the costliness of the extra ounce of prevention, nursing staff issues and the question of active surveillance culturing – disappeared once and for all.
And as far as infection prevention initiatives and next steps go – I am confident and assured that we all know the right way to proceed.
by Victoria Nahum, co-founder of safecarecampaign.org
by Jon Barron
You go to the bathroom at the bookstore, wash your hands, then lift your purse off the shelf where you had it resting and continue into the store where you purchase a book. Do you think you're safe from germs because you washed your hands with soap? Think again, because according to studies, the toilet seat has fewer bacteria than the bottom of the purse you just handled, and it's cleaner than the money you receive as change from the store clerk.
Although most of us are conscientious about hand washing after using public restrooms (let us hope), we ignore some of the most insidious sources of bacteria. A recent study by Nelson Laboratories in Salt Lake City investigated the cleanliness of women's purses. Study director and microbiologist Amy Karen found the results shocking, noting that the handbags in the sample tested positive not only for the presence of bacteria, but for bacteria of the worst kind--including pseudomonas, which can cause eye infections; staphylococcus aurous which can cause serious skin infections; and e coli, which causes food poisoning.
In one test, four out of five handbags tested positive for salmonella. Perhaps worse, a similar study out of the University of Arizona found that one-third of the hand-bags in the sample had fecal bacteria present. In fact, some of the purses were 100 times dirtier than the average toilet seat. While a bacteria level of 200 is considered safe, most of the purses weighed in at tens of thousands, and a few had bacteria counts in the millions.
Of course, this makes sense if you think about it. Women stash their purses on car floors, on the baby-changing table in the restroom, on the floor at the café or the bar, on the unmade bed at the friend's house, on the counter at the bank -- places they wouldn't think of eating off of because of the germ factor. And those places are repositories of bacteria, bacteria that attach themselves to the purse and then to the hand that grabs the purse. Plus, after letting the purse scrape the floor, the typical person sets it down on the kitchen table or on the counter, where the germs happily jump off onto the food. Geronimo!!! And the issue is the same for briefcases, backpacks, and lunchboxes.
But the germs we ignore hardly limit themselves to our purses and briefcases. At the office, we share telephones, copiers, fax machines, and computer keyboards with our colleagues, and so we also share the germs that they leave on these surfaces. Dr. Chuck Gerba, the same guy who studied handbags at the University of Arizona, measured germ count in a variety of office environments and found that keyboards contain 400 times more germs than bathroom surfaces.
The telephones tested contained 25,127 microbes per square inch, contrasted with toilet seats, which had only 49. Dr. Gerba points out that virus germs can survive up to 72 hours, so the sneezing coworker who used the copier yesterday might give you the flu today without even coming into the office.
Another repository for germs is "filthy lucre," which really is filthy. A recent study found that cashiers and bank tellers are at greater risk for the flu than people who don't handle money constantly. Think about it. A man with the flu sneezes into his hand, then reaches into his wallet and hands a dollar bill to the cashier, and then you come along and receive that same bill just two minutes later.
A 2001 study of paper money at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base Medical Centre, near Dayton, Ohio, found that 86 percent of the bills tested contained germs, and seven percent carried truly harmful bacteria, like Staphylococcus aureus and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Although few extensive tests of germ counts on money have been completed, a study just this month at City University in Dublin, Ireland, found that 100 per cent of the banknotes tested carried trace amounts of cocaine. Similar research in the US has yielded comparable results, indicating not only that we have a rampant drug problem, but also, that money does indeed carry contamination.
There are other equally ugly sources of contamination -- fruits that people squeeze in supermarkets, shopping cart handles, the doorknob at the doctor's office, and so on. When you think about it, you can get pretty paranoid. A friend of mine carries a can of Lysol with her at all times to fend off germs, and that level of fear isn't healthy. (Nor do I recommend eating off the toilet seat -- a thought that might occur to you since it seems to be so much cleaner than every other surface we deal with.)
Nevertheless, here are a few things you can do to protect yourself:
Wash those handbags, briefcases, and lunchboxes periodically. Watch where you put your bags, and especially avoid the bathroom floor and eating surfaces.
Keep your work surface clean and stash a supply of cleaning pads at work for wiping down the telephone and other equipment.
Wash your hands a lot-- several times a day, and keep your hands away from your face.
From HEALTHCARE PURCHASING NEWS
by Jeannie Akridge
All eyes are on infection control as hospitals anxiously await regulations soon to be enacted by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) in which they will no longer be reimbursed for certain hospital acquired conditions (HACs). Infection control practitioners and clinicians are stepping up to the plate and being applauded for their efforts to reduce rates of healthcare acquired infections (HAIs) and other preventable errors. They’re helping to prove that reaching the elusive "zero infections" target is in fact attainable for extended periods of time, if not sustainable forever.
Leading infection control expert William Jarvis, M.D., who worked with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for 23 years, told Healthcare Purchasing News, "Depending on the patient population, getting to zero may be more challenging, but I think it really needs to be the goal for everyone. We have a number of studies now – out of Johns Hopkins; Michigan, where virtually all the ICUs in Michigan participated in the Keystone Project; as well as a number of hospitals that have participated in the Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) collaborative – where they have been able to get their rate of central venous catheter related bloodstream infections in their ICUs down to zero."
He added, "CMS has identified nine different conditions that they’re not going to pay for as of October 1, unless they’re present on admission. And one of them is vascular catheter related infections, so I think it is going to put a lot of pressure on hospital personnel to reduce these infections and reduce them not just in the ICU but in the hospital in general."
Mark E. Rupp, M.D., medical director of the department of healthcare epidemiology-infection control at the University of Nebraska Medical Center (Omaha) foresees that the CMS quality improvement measures will ultimately benefit ICPs. "I feel that the CMS reimbursement rules are helping to focus scrutiny on these infections. Many catheter-associated infections can be prevented and I think the CMS rule change is going to have a positive effect by reinforcing the preventive efforts that we’re trying to spearhead."
David Parks, general manager, global business management, Kimberly-Clark Health Care noted, "With the ever increasing state-level legislation and focus on mandatory reporting of healthcare-associated infections and the trends in pay-for-performance, I believe the role and objectives of the materials manager will change significantly over the next year or two. There will be a greater focus on investing in prevention solutions to reduce the costs associated with adverse events such as VAP and SSI."
Experts agree that in order to survive in this new pay-for-performance environment, it will no longer be enough for hospitals to simply meet the status quo when it comes to quality and safety standards.
Kathleen A. McHugh, R.N., BSN, chief executive officer of the Association for Vascular Access, noted, "I think that the expectation that you go into a hospital and get an infection is based on the fact that we don’t have high expectations. I’m not sure that zero is sustainable forever. People need to be constantly reminded to be hypervigilant," she added, "It’s this lack of attention. Two hundred years ago we were told that washing hands would reduce 90 percent of all complications. And here we are in the year 2008 and all of a sudden hand washing is not being done on a regular basis."
David Shulkin, M.D., president and chief executive officer for Beth Israel Medical Center (New York City), credits early pioneers for efforts to help facilities move beyond accepted boundaries. "I think that there has been a mindset that frankly the University of Pittsburgh as one of the leaders helped break through. The way that clinicians had looked at things is that you look at the average and you try to be better than the average. Very few people had thought about the goal should be zero, not being below average. And I think that the University of Pittsburgh in not accepting the average scores but really shooting for zero, helped the industry have a mind shift in terms of, the goal should be zero."
"We’re a top performing hospital nationally," noted Steve Lawler, president, Pitt County Memorial Hospital, Greenville, NC. "We’re well within the 90th percentile, but that last 10 percent is the hardest. You try to reinforce that every patient is important to us so therefore we need to work extra hard to get to that Zero. I think that’s what you shoot for. And even though it may be tough and it may be long in coming, that you’re not satisfied until you get there and then once you get there you look for the next big thing."
HPN talked with several trend-setters who demonstrated what it takes to break the Zero barrier.
Sophie A. Harnage, BSN, R.N., has led her nursing team at Sutter Roseville Medical Center (SRMC), Roseville, CA, on a two-year winning streak of zero catheter-related blood stream infections (CRBSIs) with every patient who is managed by an innovative central line bundle. Her work, including details of the seven-practice bundle, was featured in the December 2007 issue of the Journal of the Association for Vascular Access (JAVA)1.
Under the leadership of Brian Koll, M.D., infection control chief, Beth Israel Medical Center has also had success with implementing a bundle to eliminate central line-associated BSIs, reducing rates by 95 percent institution-wide, and maintaining zero CLABs in several units for greater than a year. While costs to implement the program were $32,000, the hospital avoided $1.4 million in charges to treat patients with CLABs.
Community Health Network in Indianapolis, IN, was part of an initial team from VHA Inc. and IHI that developed a ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) prevention bundle which is now in place throughout their five-hospital system. As a result, two of the system’s adult ICUs have had zero incidence of VAP in four years and the five-hospital system has achieved zero incidence of VAP for one year.
Pitt County Memorial Hospital (PCMH) significantly reduced the rate of VAP due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in the Surgical Intensive Care Unit (SICU) with the implementation of an active surveillance program for MRSA. The facility previously practiced high-risk screening, but according to Lawler, "we believed it was important that we screen all patients coming in to create the safest environment."
With the goal of rapidly identifying, isolating and treating patients with MRSA to prevent transmission to other patients, in February 2007, PCMH – led by Keith Ramsey, M.D., medical director for infection control – began a hospital-wide (universal) active surveillance for MRSA using the BD GeneOhm MRSA real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) diagnostic test. With laboratory results back in three to four hours versus two days, PCMH is able to test about 150 patients a day. Subsequently the MRSA VAP rate in the SICU decreased 68 percent during the initial 12-month intervention period, from 1.74 to 0.54 per 1,000 ventilator days, and there have not been any VAPs since June 2007 in the PCMH SICU.
Peggy Thompson, R.N., BSN, CIC, director of epidemiology at Tampa General Hospital (FL) said that after they adopted bundled products usage, "We started really making changes in our (VAP) percentages at the end of 2005, that’s when we really focused on the VAP bundle and implemented a mouth care kit from SAGE Products." The mouthcare kit has a toothbrush with suction, antiplaque solution, suction catheter, perox-a-mint solution, alcohol free mouthwash, oral suction adapter, toothettes with and without suction, and mouth moisturizer, designed to provide mouthcare every 2 hours.
With this change, Thompson said, "We reduced our VAP rate by 42 percent, which was a statistically significant reduction.
Thompson continued, "In August 2007, we added the usage of Kimberly-Clark’s MICROCUFF Endotracheal Tube along with the mouth care kits and other VAP bundle practices. At the end of 2007 we found that when we compared VAP rates in 2006 to 2007 we had achieved a 54 percent reduction. We then went back and compared January through July 2007 rates, to August through April 2008 to determine what if any effect the implementation of the new ET tube had made. We discovered that we had achieved a 39 percent reduction in VAP, largely attributed to the new ET tube." Since August 2007, Tampa General has had three months with zero VAP rates. Thompson said this was a significant accomplishment because they were averaging the use of 75 ventilators a day during those zero rate months.
At the heart of nearly every successful HAI reduction program is a bundle, the kind endorsed by the IHI and others.
Deborah Dix, R.N., Sutter Roseville Cancer Services director, described a bundle as a "combination of products and procedures that consistently and reliably give you an outcome."
The Association for Vascular Access (AVA) is working with the Association for Professionals in Infection Control & Epidemiology (APIC) to develop a model central line bundle. "The whole notion of CRBSIs has been a problem for many years, said McHugh, "even making decisions on which vascular access device to use has been rooted in the incidence of CRBSI, based on whether it’s a non-tunneled central line, which is the highest risk, to an implanted port, which is the lowest risk."
Baxter Healthcare sponsored a symposium at the 2008 Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA) Annual Scientific Meeting titled, "Battling Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections: What has worked; What is now needed?" Panel moderator Robert Weinstein, M.D., chair, infectious diseases, Stroger (Cook County) Hospital, Chicago, described the measures that should be part of any program to help prevent CRBSIs:
• Performance measures from HICPAC 2002 BSI Prevention Guidelines
• Educate personnel
• Remove unused catheters
• Use chlorhexidine for site prep and care
• Use maximal barrier precautions for CVC insertion
• Use a check list to insure that the performance measures are followed
• Empower nurses to stop CVC insertion if guidelines are not being followed.
Dr. Weinstein noted that the above measures "prevent the early onset of skin/insertion site related BSIs (the ‘extraluminal’ pathway of infection) and prevent two-thirds or more of BSIs, up to 100 percent."
The central line bundle implemented at Sutter Roseville included: Optimal site selection using ultrasound guided insertion; full barrier precautions; a central line dressing kit that includes ChloraPrep (Cardinal Health), BioPatch disk with CHG (Johnson & Johnson), optional Statlock, and 3M Tegaderm Transparent Dressing (3M Health Care); replacement of positive pressure connectors with InVision-Plus Neutral IV Connector System (RyMed Technologies Inc.); a clear and defined technique of cleansing the septum connector; clearly defined flushing protocols; and daily monitoring of PICCS.
"It’s not like we made just one change and it worked," explained Dix. "We developed an entirely new process that works together as a complete package. We don’t know which [element] makes the greater difference. We just know the package resulted in a successful outcome."
Agreed McHugh: "No one thing as a standalone probably would have worked, but everything together works in synergy, because [they’re] covering all the bases."
Hands-on intensive training was integral to the Sutter Roseville bundle with PICC nurses rounding to the bedside daily. Dix believes that meticulous daily monitoring and site checks are key to their success. "We can identify problems early. And we create a relationship with the nursing staff [and physicians] so that they feel very comfortable coming to us with questions and problem solving."
According to Dan Kidwell, network director of neuro sciences and pulmonary outcomes, Community Health Network, components of the vent bundle, developed in conjunction with VHA and the IHI as part of the Idealized Design of the ICU collaborative, includes keeping the head of the bed elevated to
30°, appropriate sedation, oral care, assessment for the ability to extubate the patient, DVT and PUD prophylaxis. Community Health Network also utilizes other innovative and cost-saving measures throughout their system in what Kidwell calls their "recipe for prevention of VAP". With laser like focus, Kidwell and the Community team set out to eradicate VAP from their health system by looking at processes, protocols and equipment, challenging the status quo and implementing ground-breaking ideas along the way.
"I would tell every institution that reads this, that they need to follow the vent bundle because it is a good base," said Kidwell. "There’s evidence to support it. I would also tell them that it’s a very comprehensive view that they’ve got to take because it is now understood that VAP is avoidable. They’ve got to look at the culture of their organization, instill the belief that they can not only get to zero, but perhaps can eradicate VAP through the empowerment of staff and leaders to look at their environment and make change. By integrating education, cultural transformation, staff empowerment, and even instituting technology adaptation, those things can completely change how you work."
At Beth Israel Medical Center, compliance with bundle practices is enforced with kits that that contain the necessary components for safe central line insertions. Dr. Shulkin explained, "We make this easier for the clinicians by putting everything together into one centralized kit, which includes maximal barrier precautions plus an applicator and protective disk with chlorhexidine gluconate."
Sources related the importance of a checklist in ensuring consistency. "The primary thrust of any bundle is a ‘checklist’, borrowing from the airline industry," said McHugh. "If everybody does everything they’re supposed to do there will be no errors."
Added Dr. Jarvis, "If that checklist is used at the time of catheter insertion, then if a bloodstream infection occurs, you can go back
and look and see if those processes were all done correctly. And if they were, then perhaps it was a CRBSI that was inevitable."
McHugh emphasized the need for basic hygiene and aseptic technique in preventing CRBSIs. "While there’s a lot of technology out there and there are a lot of good products – there are hundreds of good products – washing hands and using antisepsis when accessing a central line, that’s the most important thing."
Dr. Jarvis discussed the need to ‘scrub the hub’ in order to maintain sterile technique. "Often times you see clinicians when they manipulate a catheter, they’ll take the needleless connector at the end and then they’ll swab it with alcohol for about one second and then disconnect it. Well, that’s insufficient," he explained. "There was a study by Dr. Dennis Maki that showed that if you did that for literally five seconds to ten seconds, that almost 70 percent of them were still contaminated. So you need to have probably at least a 15 second scrub with either alcohol or chlorhexidine whenever you manipulate that needleless connector."
Dr. Rupp of the University of Nebraska recently led one of two studies presented at the 2008 SHEA Annual Scientific Meeting that evaluated 3M’s new Tegaderm CHG IV Securement Dressing. Dr. Rupp’s study2 compared the 3M Tegaderm product to the facility’s standard transparent dressing and concluded that "the Tegaderm CHG dressing containing a chlorhexidine gel pad is an innovative means to potentially minimize CA-BSI", and also that "the Tegaderm CHG dressing is well-tolerated and judged to be superior to the comparator dressing with regard to catheter securement and overall satisfaction." Dr. Rupp commented that while additional studies are still needed to determine if the 3M Tegaderm dressing does indeed reduce BSIs, "all of these preliminary studies are very optimistic. They’re very reassuring that the dressing performs well and does have some good microbiologic effects."
Leading change management
Support from the top is essential for any successful infection prevention program, said Dr. Ramsey. "First of all you have to have administrative support. Secondly, you have to have buy-in from your staff, physicians and nurses."
A successful HAI reduction program also needs a champion for that change as well as empowerment of staff and clinicians. Said Dr. Shulkin, "We have really empowered our staff – every nurse, nursing assistant, housekeeper, physician – any member of the team who sees anybody who is not using an appropriate kit for insertion, or violating one of the infection control practices can declare Red Rule, and that can stop the insertion process in its tracks so that every healthcare team member has the power if they see something that puts a patient at risk to stop the process. And they know that they will be supported in this."
Dr. Weinstein advised, "Create high expectations from staff, create a culture of safety, educate and hold staff responsible for their actions and patient outcomes, treat HAIs as internal sentinel events that trigger an analysis of what happened and what was preventable. Don’t settle for less."
See the 2008 Infection Control Buyer's Guide: